Structuring Post Series

Purpose of the Pillar Page

This page must do five things simultaneously:

1. Define “structure” from first principles, not jargon.


2. Separate business risk from structural strength cleanly.


3. Introduce the 6 structure blocks as a usable mental model.


4. Anchor everything to recovery and haircut, not prevention of default.


5. Act as the navigation hub for all deeper posts and tools.






Detailed Section-by-Section Outline

1. Opening: Why “Structure” Is So Often Misunderstood

Objective: Reset the reader’s mental model.

Key points:

“Structure” is used loosely in banking and investing.

It is often confused with business quality or riskiness.

A strong structure does not make a weak business strong.

It determines what happens after the business fails to perform.


SEO keywords naturally embedded:

financial structure

banking structure

credit structure

capital structure vs collateral





2. Business Risk vs Structure Strength (Foundational Distinction)

This is the most important section.

Explain clearly:

Business risk affects future cash flow and asset values.

Structure does not change those risks.

Structure determines how losses are allocated when those risks materialise.


Explicit statement:

> Higher business risk requires stronger structure if recovery is to be preserved.



Introduce PD and LGD only conceptually, not mathematically:

Probability of default comes from the business.

Loss given default is shaped by structure.


Link forward:

“The rest of this page explains what structure actually consists of.”





3. What “Structure Strength” Really Means in Practice

Define structure strength in plain language:

Lower haircut on deployed capital.

Faster and more certain recovery.

Less value leakage before enforcement.


Introduce the idea:

Two deals with the same business risk can have very different outcomes because of structure.


Simple illustrative example (no numbers yet):

Same borrower, same downturn, different recovery paths.





4. De Jure Structure vs De Facto Structure

This is where you introduce your important distinction.

Explain:

De jure structure is what documents say.

De facto structure is what actually happens when cash becomes tight.


Examples (high level):

Legal seniority without cash control.

Strong collateral with weak enforcement.

Covenants that trigger too late.


Positioning:

> Senior practitioners focus on de facto structure, not just documentation.



This sets up the need for multiple structure blocks.




5. The Six Structure Blocks (High-Level Overview)

Introduce the six blocks as complementary, not standalone.

Use a clean diagram here.

For each block:

One sentence on purpose.

One sentence on what it primarily affects.


Block A: Capital Loss Absorption

Who bears loss first and how much.

Block B: Legal and Entity Containment

Where loss is legally trapped.

Block C: Cash Flow Control

Who controls cash before and during stress.

Block D: Contractual Intervention

When rights shift and action can be taken.

Block E: Asset and Credit Support

What backs recovery if cash flow fails.

Block F: Liquidity and Execution Support

Whether value survives stress without forced loss.

Each block links to its own series page.




6. How Structure Responds to Business Risk Over Time

This section reinforces your dynamic point.

Explain:

Business risk can change quickly.

Structure changes slowly because it is contractual and multi-party.

This creates a structural lag.


Key insight:

> Structure must be designed early, when negotiating power exists.



Introduce:

Why retrofitting structure after risk rises is usually ineffective.


This is banker-realistic and educational.




7. What Structure Can and Cannot Do (Boundary Conditions)

Explicit limits:

Structure cannot fix weak demand.

Structure cannot stabilise volatile cash flow.

Structure cannot prevent default.


Explicit capabilities:

Reduce loss severity.

Improve recovery certainty.

Shift loss to parties better able to absorb it.


This prevents misuse of the framework.




8. How This Framework Applies Across Scenarios

Short subsections, no depth yet.

Corporate lending

Project finance

Leveraged buyouts

Bond investing


Key message:

Same structure blocks.

Different emphasis.


Links to scenario-specific pages.




9. Practical Tools for Bankers and Clients

Introduce the tools without selling language.

Structure strength checklist

Scenario worksheets

One-page cheat sheets


Position them as:

> A way to think through structure systematically, not mechanically.






10. Closing: Structure Is About Recovery, Not Optimism

Strong closing that reinforces discipline.

Suggested closing thought:

> When business risk rises, optimism disappears quickly.
Structure is what remains.



Call to action:

Read the detailed series.

Use the checklist.

Apply it before risk increases.





SEO Architecture Notes (Important)

One H1 only.

Each major section as H2.

Structure blocks as H3.

Internal links to:

Each block series

Checklists and worksheets


External links optional, not necessary.





Visual Assets to Plan

1. Business risk vs structure strength diagram


2. De jure vs de facto structure flow


3. Six structure blocks overview


4. Timeline showing risk change vs structure change



These materially improve comprehension and dwell time.




Next step options

Once you confirm this outline, we can:

1. Write the full pillar page in banker language.


2. Design the Structure Strength Checklist page next.


3. Start with Block C: Cash Flow Control as the first deep-dive series.

STRUCTURE BLOCK A: Capital Loss Absorption Structure

Question: Who loses money first when things go wrong?

(Primarily LGD control)

Includes:

Capital structure Instrument or facility features (seniority, maturity, optionality)

Why grouped:

These jointly define the loss waterfall and timing. In practice, bankers discuss these together in any capital discussion.

STRUCTURE BLOCK B: Legal and Entity Containment Structure

Question: Where does loss legally stop?

(Primarily LGD through reachability)

Includes:

3. Legal entity and corporate structure

4. Regulatory and insolvency regime effects

Why grouped:

Entity placement is meaningless without insolvency context. Recovery depends on both at the same time.

STRUCTURE BLOCK C: Cash Flow Control Structure (De Facto Seniority)

Question: Who controls cash before default?

(Bridges PD and LGD)

Includes:

5. Cash flow routing and control mechanics

6. Cash flow partitioning (pre-allocated vs operational control)

7. Contractual waterfalls

Your terminology fits well here:

De jure: what ranking says. De facto: where cash actually goes.

This block deserves heavy emphasis. It is where senior practitioners differentiate themselves.

STRUCTURE BLOCK D: Contractual Control and Intervention Structure

Question: When can someone step in?

(Primarily PD containment, secondarily LGD)

Includes:

8. Covenants and triggers

9. Behavioural and incentive alignment mechanisms

Why grouped:

Both are about influencing behaviour before value is destroyed. One is restrictive, the other is incentive-based.

STRUCTURE BLOCK E: Asset and Credit Support Structure

Question: What backs recovery if cash flow fails?

(Direct LGD reduction)

Includes:

10. Collateral and security (physical assets)

11. Guarantees and credit support (financial backing)

As you suggested:

Physical collateral relies on asset value and enforceability. Financial collateral relies on third-party cash flow and balance sheet.

They behave differently and must be compared explicitly.

STRUCTURE BLOCK F: Liquidity and Execution Support Structure

Question: Can the structure survive stress without forced loss?

(Indirect LGD reduction)

Includes:

12. Liquidity buffers and reserves

13. External enforceability enhancements

Why grouped:

Both determine whether value leaks during stress. Often invisible in good times, decisive in bad times.

Summary: 6 structure blocks

Block

Banker mental use

A. Capital loss absorption

Who loses first

B. Legal containment

Where loss stops

C. Cash flow control

Who controls cash

D. Contractual intervention

When action happens

E. Asset and credit support

What backs recovery

F. Liquidity and execution

How losses are avoided

This is a working taxonomy, not academic.

SEO-optimised WordPress post series (proposed)

This should be a pillar + cluster model for SEO.

Pillar Page (Anchor Content)

Title (example):

“How Bankers Design Structures to Control Risk and Recovery”

Purpose:

Define “structure” in banker terms. Introduce the 6 structure blocks. Link out to each detailed post. Establish authority.

This page should rank for:

financial structuring banking structure credit structure capital structure vs collateral

Cluster Series: One block per series

Each block becomes 3–5 posts, depending on depth.

Series A: Capital Loss Absorption Structure

Posts:

Capital structure and recovery: why equity exists before debt

Senior, subordinated, hybrid: how priority really works

Maturity and amortisation: why timing changes loss

Worked example: same business, three capital structures, different outcomes

Each post:

One numbered worked example One simple balance sheet and cash flow Explicit LGD comparison

Series B: Legal and Entity Containment Structure

Posts:

Holding company vs operating company debt

Structural subordination explained with numbers

Jurisdiction and insolvency: why location matters

Worked example: same assets, different entity placement, different recovery

Series C: Cash Flow Control Structure (De Facto Seniority)

This should be your flagship series.

Posts:

De jure vs de facto seniority: why documents are not enough

Cash flow routing mechanisms explained

Cash flow partitioning before lenders see cash

Waterfalls in practice: who gets paid first and why

Worked example: covenant intact but cash trapped

This will differentiate your site.

Series D: Contractual Control and Intervention

Posts:

Covenants as early intervention tools

Why covenant breaches are not defaults

Incentives vs restrictions in restructuring

Worked example: value preserved vs value destroyed

Series E: Asset and Credit Support Structure

Posts:

Collateral does not prevent default

Physical collateral vs financial support

Guarantees: shifting risk, not removing it

Worked example: asset-backed vs guarantee-backed loan

Series F: Liquidity and Execution Support

Posts:

Liquidity buffers and forced sale risk

Why reserves reduce loss more than collateral

Enforcement mechanics in cross-border deals

Worked example: same collateral, different recovery timelines

Cross-scenario posts (high SEO value)

After the above:

“How structure differs in project finance”

“How structure differs in LBOs”

“How bond investors think about structure”

“How banks and bondholders view the same structure differently”

Each reuses the 6 blocks.

Mandatory elements in every post (non-negotiable)

To avoid consultant drift, every post must include:

Purpose of the structure in one paragraph

What risk it responds to

What it can and cannot do

One worked, numbered example

Link to the relevant checklist or worksheet

This keeps content operational.

Checklists, worksheets, and cheat sheets (WordPress pages)

These should be tools, not downloads.

A. Master Structure Checklist (Core Page)

Sections aligned to the 6 blocks:

Capital loss absorption

Legal containment

Cash flow control

Contractual intervention

Asset and credit support

Liquidity and execution

Each section:

Yes / No questions

Space for banker notes

Links to explanatory posts

This becomes your conversion asset.

B. Scenario-Specific Worksheets

Examples:

Project finance structure worksheet

Corporate lending structure worksheet

LBO structure worksheet

Each worksheet:

Same 6 blocks Different emphasis

Different example prompts

C. One-page Cheat Sheets

Examples:

“Structure vs PD vs LGD”

“De jure vs de facto seniority”

“Collateral types and recovery drivers”

These should be printable but live online.

5. Strategic positioning (important)

What you are building is not “content”.

It is a banker’s operating system for structure.

That is rare, defensible, and consistent with your:

Risks / Structures / Actions framing PD–LGD–EAD logic Senior practitioner audience.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *